(here through a question in icon_tutorial, but totally unrelated)
... though under California state law, if you're under the influence then you can't give consent, so technically it still was rape
Does this mean that they're both technically the victim and the perpetrator? If it was consensual (as much as it could be), then they both initiated it, therefore they could both be put in that position...
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
no subject
Date: 2005-05-08 04:08 am (UTC)... though under California state law, if you're under the influence then you can't give consent, so technically it still was rape
Does this mean that they're both technically the victim and the perpetrator? If it was consensual (as much as it could be), then they both initiated it, therefore they could both be put in that position...